Text Box:

by Rolly Angeles, Reliability Consultant

 

I have asked some of my friends from reliability forums if all failures can really be eliminated, some say yes and others simply say that we can only eliminate a fraction of them.  Hence, I tried to rephrase my question by asking which of these following statements would you think would be more appropriate, relevant and meaningful :

 

1st : We can eliminate failures by analyzing them through a thorough RCA and RCFA methodologies.

 

2nd : We cannot eliminate the likelihood of a failure but rather we can only prevent or predict the failure from occurring on its own.

 

3rd : Failures cannot be eliminated and that the best that we maintenance and reliability people can do is to reduce

the frequency of failures.

 

4rth : Failures cannot be eliminated, the best that we can do is to delay or prolong the process of failure occurring.

 

 


     Welcome to your Reliability Monthly Newsletter for the month of June 2007.  You are receiving this email because at some point in time and for reasons that you opted to be included in our Newsletter mailing list from our web at www.rsareliability.com

 

     Our newsletter will be sent out once a month and provide you with quality articles and resources on our most common link which is reliability and maintenance, as well as regular updates on our articles.  I would like to personally invite you to visit our new website regularly and check out updates on our articles and training courses.

 

 

rsarsa
RSA Reliability and Maintenance Consultancy Firm
rsaText Box:        
Text Box: Change answers why industries cannot remain the same in the future . . . . .

     Finally should you be interested to contribute to our articles section or share any feedback, I encourage you to email me at rollyangeles@rsareliability.com.  If for any reason you wish to unsubscribe from our newsletter, kindly send my a blank email with unsubscribe as the heading and we shall remove you from our mailing lists.  Once again I hope that you enjoy reading our Reliability Newsletter.

 

My Warm Regards,

 

 

 

 

 

Website : www.rsareliaiblity.com

Email : rollyangeles@rsareliability.com

RELIABILITY NEWSLETTER

First and foremost, All failures are not created equal (each failure will have their own consequence), and that the word failure itself is very broad and diversified and can have some different meaning or interpretation , sometimes confusion arise as when do we call it a failure, before answering my question, I would like to explain failure in the way I have understand it.

 

PATTERNS OF FAILURE (HOW FAILURE OCCURS)

 

Infant Mortality Failures - These are failures that occur at the beginning of its life.  Others call them start-up failures, commissioning failures which are likely to occur after a major overhaul or Preventive Maintenance had been initiated

 

Random Failures - These are failures that can occur at any given period, and this is where our routine Preventive Maintenance will be at its weakest point, recommended task that can be used for Random failures will be Predictive Maintenance if the failure provides a warning or potential failure and that it is on the verge of process of occurring, modification or simply run it until it fails if the consequences when the risk and consequences will be low and tolerable.


Wear Out Failures also known as Age-Related Failures where parts will eventually survive to the age that it is suppose to fail

 

John Moubray author of RCM further indicates in his book  that these three failures mostly occur in combination by studying parts behavior and led to what we call the 6 failure pattern, But eventually those 3 patterns of failure (bathtub curve) can be seen as existing in TPM books, Statistical  books and Weibull Distribution.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF FAILURES

 

Hidden Failures, failures that will not become evident to the operator or maintenance when it occurs on its own such as failure of a standby pump with the duty pump running

 

Evident Failures, are failures that will become evident to the operator and maintenance when it occurs on its own

 

DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAILURES

 

Function Loss Failure - or failure of the primary function, wherein when a failure occurs the equipment will totally stop and will definitely affect operations.  RCM term this as failure of the Primary Function.

 

Function Loss Reduction - or failure of secondary functions wherein when a failure occurs the equipment can still be capable of running. Every equipment have their own primary and secondary functions that we must be aware off. One thing to note is that there are cases that the consequences of failure of secondary functions are far much worst than the failure of the primary function

 

From TPM Books, references and resources breakdowns and failures can either be Planned or Unplanned and what maintenance can prevent or eliminate or zero out is the unplanned breakdown and not to mention cases of chronic and sporadic failures and breakdowns.

 

Planning for an activity to be performed on our equipment, such as routine Preventive Maintenance, parts replacement will constitute the Planned Breakdown, and also Predictive Maintenance group spotting that a potential failure which is now in progress and the next step is scheduling the equipment for some intervention also constitute a Planned Breakdown . While Unplanned Breakdown simply means that when failure occurs we are unaware and are always caught by surprise on its occurrence.

 

Hence, going back and answering  these statements :

 

1st : We can definitely eliminate failures by analyzing them through a thorough RCFA and RCA

 

Wrong !!! Failures cannot be totally eliminated by analyzing them through RCFA and RCA. We must consider that there are a variety of causes to understand and analyze and every single failure have their own unique causes and when we  treat a single cause then there is a likelihood of that same part to fail again in the future due to a different cause, remember when we speak about Root Cause Failure Analysis and Root Cause Analysis, we are dealing with evidences as to what really have caused the part to fail and not all the probable causes that might have cause the part to fail.


As my good and dear friend
Bob Nelms from Failsafe Network once told me that you cannot move an ocean with a fork (not even a spoon) simply concurs that it is possible to remove or eliminate the causes but not the failure itself.

 

A bearing can fail for a multiple variety of reasons and taking care only on a single cause (perhaps the analysis shows that bearing failure was due to lubrication failure) will not eliminate its recurrence since it can fail in the future due to some other reasons such as brinelling, pitting fatigue, spalling, misalignment, careless handling, over lube, under lube, and many more.

 

RCM was founded on the belief that its purpose was to eliminated / reduce plane crashes per million take-offs by studying every single part and its behavior. Today, plane still crashes for some other reasons such as terrorism.

 

2nd : We cannot eliminate the likelihood of a failure, but rather we can only prevent or predict the failure from occurring.

 

Yes for some failures, it is possible to prevent them and this is true for age related failures or parts and components which inhibits some sort of wear out mode and which constitute around 15 to 20% of overall equipment failures and likewise we can predict failures for those who shows signs of potential failures.


But this is not the goal of maintenance, if a bearing fails prematurely, yes we can predict that it is on the verge of failing, but the life of the bearing had not been maximized at all, perhaps we were able to predict it from failing and we have advise operations about it but we should not stop from here, data from Predictive Maintenance can be most useful in analyzing why component fails, Predictive Maintenance is a one step forward towards achieving a Proactive Maintenance and not to mention that not all failures can be predicted and prevented.


3rd : Failures cannot be eliminated and the best that maintenance can do is to reduce them.

 

Wrong !!! Some think that when we have experience zero unplanned breakdown or have reduced failure tremendously as per seen on our breakdown indices for the past couple of years we think that we have eliminated the failure completely, but come to think of it technically have we have really eliminated the likelihood of a failure  or rather we have just delayed the failure process to occur ? Just try to think of buying a second hand car and driving it and giving it the best maintenance ever, eventually there are still many parts that are subject to  wearing out and when parts wear out then they have actually and eventually failed isn’t it ?


4rth : Failures cannot be eliminated and that the best that maintenance can do is to prolong or delay the process of failure itself from occurring.


Correct !!! I think that we must not be misled that maintenance can eliminate failures
, Failures cannot be eliminated. they will happen and they will occur, the best that we can do is to delay its process, control the timing of failure or eventually prolong the occurrence of failure, yet in the end failure and breakdowns will occur on our equipment and we must be ready for it.


CONCLUSION:


Failures cannot be eliminated and failures vary in consequences, the best the we maintenance and reliability people can do is to delay the process of failure and control the timing of failure but eventually and inevitably expect failure to occur in the future.


If you are experiencing a no failure situation in your equipment, it is just temporary, because of your good system of maintenance, the truth is you are just delaying the process of failures.


I've been in the field of TPM for so many years and its goal is to zero out unplanned breakdowns is idealistic and in its technical sense next to impossible if we really understand how part really behaves, when parts wear out, in its technical sense it failed. Hence, we are not really eliminating failure itself but just doing the best we can to prolong the life of the part or component.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT :

 

I would like to thank and acknowledge the following  who have responded on this thread at reliabilityweb forum and RCFA forum : Darth Eugene Vader, Ozgipsy, Josh from Borneo, Mike 66, Terrence O Hanlon, Arie Mol, Joe Mc Cormack, Sam Pickens, Robbie Dane, Metalworker Mike, Christian Delagado,  Vee Narayan,  C. Robert Nelms, Michael Mulligan, Bill Salot,  Richard of Comcast.com, Tore Skuglund, Brenda Nauman, Bruce Harts

 

 

 

 

 

 

rsa

RELIABILITY & MAINTENANCE CONSULTANCY FIRM

 

Where the learning just never stops . . .

 

Oval:

RSA

 

Text Box: HOMESITE Text Box: CONTACT US
free counter
Text Box: Text Box: Where the learning just never stops . . . . 
Text Box: RSA FIRM 2010 All Rights Reserved

For our complete archive of previous reliability newsletter

Text Box: TO OUR VALUED SUBSCRIBERS :

Issue No. 2 - June 2007

Text Box: Can Equipment Failures Really be eliminated ?
Text Box: To Unsubscribe :

RSA Reliability and Maintenance Consultancy Firm values the privacy of your email.  Should you wish to unsubscribe or do not want to receive any more email or messages from us kindly send me a blank email with unsubscribe on the subject and we will remove you from our mailing lists.  Click here to Unsubscribe !

Text Box: Gallery: New pictures for 2010 added  from the gallery portion.
Newsletter: November 2009 Edition finally released to our subscribers.  Email me if you want to subscribe to our Newsletter.
2010 Training Schedule: If you are interested to attend in any of our public workshop and master class for 2010.  Send us an email or register online.
WCM Book: If you’re interested in buying the book on World Class Maintenance, The 12 Disciplines.  Send me an email to reserve.  WCM Book is now available. Get your copy now.
In-house Training :Should your industry be interested for in-house trainings we’re now accepting regular schedules for in-house training for both local and international countries on courses offered.  Contact us now. Email us l 



rsa updatesText Box: COURSES ON CD
(Now Available)
Text Box: RSA UPDATES
( February 2010 )
Text Box: RSA FORUM
( Discussion Board)
Text Box: Our Reliability Newsletter will be provided once a month to our valued subscribers. It provides highlights as well as issues and lessons regarding our most common link which is all about  improving the      reliability of equipment.
Click Here !

Text Box: Registration at this forum is done through administration only. Should you be interested to join send me an email and we will provide you with a user ID and password. Visit my discussion board and forum . . 
   Click Here !!!

Share what you know. Come and join our maintenance forum.    Send me an email
Text Box: Select the courses of your choice and it  can be made available in CD .  Click Here !


rsa cdText Box: TESTIMONIALS( Feedback )
Text Box: We are very much flattered and humbled by your feedback and testimonies.  Your messages are the main reason for allowing us to stay in this business.  With all humility we say thank you and rest assure that we are continuously improving.  Without your support in our training there won’t be us.   Read More !
testimoniesText Box: Subscribe To My  Newsletter
click torsa forumText Box: World Class Maintenance Management - The 12 Disciplines Book is now available here.  This is not only about the technical jargon on reliability and maintenance, it is a book that makes every single maintenance proud that they belong to the maintenance function.  If you have been living through the day to day pressures of doing maintenance then this is your story.  If you are interested in this book, send me an email.  Click Here !
Text Box: World Class
Maintenance Book
(Now Available)
button

COURSES

 

buttonbuttonbuttonbuttonbuttonbutton
buttonbutton
buttonbutton